‘Free Energy’ Generator Inventor: “I’ve Been Poisoned Several Times”

According to recently published reports, a couple engineers named Adam Trombly and Joseph Kahn went through the process of designing an electrical generator they call the Closed Path Homopolar Generator. They applied for patents, claiming that their generator features a revolutionary design, with extreme efficiency for the generation of electrical power.

Adam Trombly reports that not only are free energy devices suppressed, but he claimed to have been poisoned on multiple occasions.

The definition of a “free energy” machine was explained by Collective Evolution, who published an article about this topic. They explained that “free” in the phrase means, decentralized basically: that ordinary people can generate energy or electricity or whatever it is themselves, without the need for a corporate monopoly like for example, General Electric, or PG&E.

Free energy devices are sometimes quickly dismissed as pseudo-scientific, but the phrase does not mean that unlimited energy is being produced out of thin air: the emphasis is meant to be placed on decentralization, power being put into the hands of individual people to have their own power, rather than the centralization of corporations providing electricity, requiring harmful smart meters to be placed on homes with electricity, ect.

Nikola Tesla once said:

“Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel…We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians….Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static, or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheel work of nature.”

It appears there are many ways people could choose to have electricity or energy in their homes, and the monopoly over these facilities is absolutely unnecessary.

Why should the government be the one to determine whether or not a patent is granted? Some people have to wait decades and decades to receive patents for technology that might threaten the powers that be.

For example, a man named Dr. Gerald F. Ross filed a patent for an invention that would defeat what is known as jamming electromagnetic transmissions at different frequencies. Almost 37 entire years later, on June 17, 2014 the patent was finally granted. He filed it nearly 40 years before that.

On top of that, are people aware how many new inventions get put under government “secrecy orders?” That’s right, over 5,000 inventions that were clamped down upon under secrecy orders were recorded at the end of Fiscal Year 2014.

So take a look at this patent. It is by Adam Trobly and Joseph Kahn, for the Closed Path Homopolar Generator.

Quite difficult to comprehend the difficulty with this patent, here is what CE had to say:

“In June of 1982, International Letters of Patent were published by the International Patent Cooperation Treaty Organization. You can view that patent here.
The difference between the international patents and the US patent system is that in the US the material of the patent is secret until the patent is granted, while overseas the application itself is the basis of the patent, which stands until challenged by a third party.”

The abstract of the patent reads:

“A co-rotating generator homopolar has a rotor (12) comprising a driver disc (30) and the co-rotating co-axial electro-magnets (32a and 32b) on each side, and has an improved operation using a magnetic return circuit low reluctance for the magnetic flux which passes through the driver disc (30). The low reluctance circuit allows the electro-magnets (32a and 32b) to produce a high intensity field with a value of the excitation current of the relatively low coil. Therefore, overheating is eliminated and the total potential of zero sequence generator is obtained. The low magnetic reluctance return circuit (220) is preferably formed by a co-rotating enclosure of relatively high permeability (with halves of speakers (37a and 37b) of sufficient radial and axial dimensions for holding the electromagnets and the driver disc of the rotor. the driver disc (30) is constructed preferably with a material of high permeability, low resistivity, such as iron, and may of course be integral with the cores of the electromagnets (35a and 35b) .”

To read more about how this man claims he was poisoned, click this link. Unfortunately it’s not easy to tell in this article where the evidence is for this, it seems to be in the links they provided.

(Image credit: slideplayer, collective-evolution, renegadetribune)


The Latest

To Top